Wild Justice

panel finished going over their notes to make sure they had brou

d Diana began the cross examination

e written in his memo to the dean and wh

the dean and also testified that I gave you all

y twenty years ago in this material the committee has introduced as that sent to the document examiners. These w

ent to the document examiners as standards. Good God, he thought. What

ing around her question. Instead of yes or no, he would repeat at length so

the 'suspect' SmurFFs before it was sent out for analysis. But it was like pulling teeth.

wn. "Were the document examiners given this evaluation with

that critique as havin

the critique was given them-accordi

ss so,

s previous testimony of how the blank critiques, the SmurFFs, were gi

as able to reveal most of the lies he had told of t

s was sloppy and unreliable. That it had indeed, been this way for years. Given that, she thought, ho

murFFs. They considered it a useless effort since little o

ould not receive their grade for the course from the dean's office. Most students bring in completed evaluation forms, place them in the box prov

ed as she jotted down the information being squeezed out

urFFs were left out

any body could have

d SmurFFs left in th

ere separated and giv

tiques went to

the number of crit

could come

e critique

ubmitted critiqu

eetings when Ian and Randy met with Lyle, con

as claimed in his memo to the dean. She re-read what he'd written in the memo, "These fictitious

laimed that perhaps his language had not been perfect in that phrase but what he meant wa

student critique that had not been deemed 'suspicious' by Lyle. It h

he literature which support the statement in the handouts,' (in a lecture, Randy had emphasized that the primary function of the female breast was to attract a mate) 'but was not aware that THE NAKED APE, PENTHOUSE MAGAZINE, PLAYBOY MAGAZINE and so forth were regarded

injurious but I do not see this student critique amon

e. He dodged and refused to answer directly a question asking if he always sent suspicious critique

Because of the negligent handling of the critique process, there was no authentic chain of custody maintained! In add

roof that any of the 'suspicious' SmurFFs he claimed were found, had ever been placed in the return box provided for the students. In fact, except for the few critiques tha

itnesses or evidence that could confirm his testimony that students had be

w take a lunch break. How could that idiot sit there and let himself give away that kind of detail on how SmurFFs were handled in his department? Henry