Papers and proceedings of the thirty-fifth general meeting of the American Library Association, 1913
ease be practical." Perhaps I have elsewhere in-adroitly given the impression that I believe classification for libraries should be a matter of science or of philosophy. I did indeed say in print, s
ffectively practical. How practical should we be in classifica
. This we may term the na?ve view, to borrow a phrase from recent philosophical literature. But some of those who have undertaken to maintain a classification for a large university or reference library know that it is one of th
ere should be somewhat in library service beyond mere statistical and technical economies. Our arrangement of books should not be in